Produksi dan Kebutuhan Oksigen di SWK Cibeunying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Urban parks play a crucial role in supplying oxygen as part of the ecological functions of green open spaces. This study aims to analyze the oxygen production from urban parks in the Cibeunying Sub-City Area (SWK Cibeunying) and compare it with the oxygen demand of the local population. The research employed a quantitative approach, with oxygen production estimated from vegetation cover and biomass conversion values from the literature, while oxygen demand was calculated based on population numbers multiplied by the standard oxygen requirement per capita. The results indicate that oxygen production from urban parks in SWK Cibeunying remains significantly lower than the oxygen demand of its inhabitants. This finding highlights that urban parks alone cannot fulfill the community’s oxygen needs, emphasizing the importance of other green spaces and broader environmental management strategies. The study underlines the urgency of enhancing both the quality and quantity of urban green open spaces to support ecological sustainability and public health. Abstrak. Taman kota memiliki peran penting dalam menyediakan oksigen sebagai bagian dari fungsi ekologis ruang terbuka hijau. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis produksi oksigen dari taman kota di Sub Wilayah Kota (SWK) Cibeunying serta membandingkannya dengan kebutuhan oksigen penduduk di kawasan tersebut. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan perhitungan produksi oksigen berdasarkan tutupan vegetasi dan literatur nilai konversi biomassa, sedangkan kebutuhan oksigen dihitung berdasarkan jumlah penduduk dikalikan standar kebutuhan oksigen per kapita. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produksi oksigen taman kota di SWK Cibeunying masih jauh lebih rendah dibandingkan kebutuhan oksigen penduduk. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa taman kota belum mampu mencukupi kebutuhan oksigen masyarakat secara langsung, sehingga keberadaan ruang terbuka hijau lain serta strategi pengelolaan lingkungan yang lebih luas menjadi krusial. Penelitian ini menegaskan urgensi peningkatan kualitas dan kuantitas ruang terbuka hijau di kawasan perkotaan untuk mendukung keberlanjutan ekologi dan kesehatan masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".