MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134980678 · doi:10.5376/me.2025.16.0002

Artificial Rearing Methods and Observations of Spodoptera litura on Soybean Plants

2025· article· W7134980678 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ping Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Entomology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural pest management studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsSpodoptera lituraLarvaCultivarCrop yieldChemical control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under controlled artificial conditions, the growth cycle and behavioral characteristics of Spodoptera litura (striped stem borer) were observed with soybean plants as the sole feed. Experimental conditions: temperature around 25°C, relative humidity 23%, with a 12-hour light and 12-hour dark alternating cycle. It was observed that the duration from the pupal stage to the next generation pupation was about 45 days, with adult emergence taking about 15 days, mating and oviposition lasting about 2 days, egg hatching taking about 4 days, and the larval stage lasting 22 days, with the prepupal period lasting about 2 days. During the larval rearing process, providing sufficient space and food can reduce cannibalistic behaviors. Observing the reproductive organs of the pupae accurately distinguishes their sex. In environments with lower humidity, reproductive efficiency decreases, with the number of new individuals being only ten times that of the previous generation. Observing Spodoptera litura in an artificial environment provides basic data for biological research, contributing to green pest control strategies and resource utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EntomologySame topicAgricultural pest management studiesFrench-language works237,207