MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134994333

Efficient Quantum Gauge Simulations with the Triamond

2025· other· en· W7134994333 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Hosseinzadehkavaki

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum simulatorQuantum algorithmLattice gauge theoryQuantum operationQuantum dynamicsOpen quantum systemQuantum processQuantumQuantum networkQuantum technology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum simulation provides a promising framework for studying non-perturbative phenomena in lattice gauge theories that are difficult to access using classical computational methods. In particular, classical Monte Carlo approaches suffer from the sign problem, limiting their applicability to real-time dynamics and finite-density regimes. Quantum computers, by directly encoding quantum dynamics, offer a natural pathway to overcoming these limitations. In this thesis, we study quantum simulations of a truncated SU(2) lattice gauge theory using a Hamiltonian formulation, representing an important non-Abelian step toward quantum chromodynamics. We focus on three-dimensional gauge-theory simulations in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, where limited qubit resources pose a significant challenge. To address this, we introduce the triamond lattice, a three-dimensional lattice geometry that enforces local gauge invariance while providing an economical encoding of gauge degrees of freedom, thereby reducing qubit overhead compared to conventional lattice constructions. We derive the corresponding Hamiltonian, construct physical gauge-invariant states, and implement quantum simulations using quantum imaginary time evolution to prepare ground states, alongside real-time evolution methods to study dynamical behavior. Error-mitigation techniques are employed to extract reliable physical observables from noisy quantum hardware. Our results demonstrate that the triamond lattice enables resource-efficient three-dimensional quantum gauge simulations and represents a practical step toward scalable quantum simulations of non-perturbative gauge theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→