MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134998384

A Concurrent List with Adaptive Bounds

2025· other· en· W7134998384 on OpenAlexaff
Shalom Moshe Asbell

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Bounded functionAmortized analysisData structureKey (lock)Concurrent data structureConcurrency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few concurrent data structures adapt dynamically to access patterns, and those that do lack formal performance guarantees. This thesis introduces the first self-adjusting concurrent data structure with an adaptive bound analogous to those of optimal self-adjusting sequential structures. We present a lock-free move-to-front (MTF) list supporting a dynamic set of keys, where an operation op on a key k runs in an amortized number of steps proportional to the size of its working plus a contention term. The working set of op is the set of keys accessed since the last operation on key k, and contention is the number of operations that run concurrently with op. We further show that the list performs at most twice as much work as the best possible fixed list for a set of searches, up to contention. Finally, we prove that the number of nodes reachable from shared memory is bounded by the number of keys in the set plus contention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)French-language works237,207