Tokyo spiritual mission during the Russo-Japanese War
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of research in the article is the Russian spiritual mission in Tokyo, which found itself at the epicenter of the events of the Russo-Japanese War. Russian spiritual missions in the Far East performed many functions in addition to direct missionary work and were guides of Russian influence in the Far Eastern region. All of them, in China, Korea and Japan, were affected to varying degrees by the war, and the Orthodox mission in Tokyo was most affected. The main approach for the study was the anthropological approach. The study used methods of retrospection and historical reconstruction, as well as microanalysis. The prosopographic method was partly used. This choice of methodology is due to the fact that the main source for the study was the "Most Comprehensive Reports of the Chief Prosecutor..." and the diaries of the head of the mission, Bishop Nikolai (Kasatkin). The result of the study is the reconstruction of the activities of the Tokyo spiritual mission in the conditions of the Russo-Japanese War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it