MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135016157 · doi:10.1093/neuped/wuaf001.109

ETMR-09. Clinical and molecular characterization of DICER-mutant Central Nervous System Sarcoma

2025· article· en· W7135016157 on OpenAlex
Dipak K. Poria, Alexis Dowiak, Lane Williamson, Julija Povilaikaite, Edgar Cabrera, Nelson Aponte, Johnny J. Garcia, Lina Quiroz, Martha Piña, Cindy Martinez, Diana Valencia, Liliana Barragan, Alma Benito Reséndiz, Henriette Magelsen, Ángela Trujillo, Diana S. Osorio, Oscar Eduardo González Figueredo, Angelica Castillo, Roger Packer, Isabel Sarmiento, Amaranto Suárez, Zied Abdullaev, Naureen Mushtaq, Ute Bartels, Eric Buffet, Bárbara Rivera Polo, Kenneth Aldape, Vijay Ramaswamy, Adriana Fonseca

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsSarcomaDNA methylationKRASGNAS complex locusSomatic cellCentral nervous systemChromothripsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) sarcomas are rare mesenchymal non-meningothelial tumors accounting for 0.2% of brain tumors. Due to their rarity, there is a lack of substantive clinical, histological and molecular data. Methods Patients diagnosed with primary CNS sarcomas were identified through several international collaborations. DNA methylation profiles were generated using 850K microarray assays, followed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t-SNE analyses. Additionally, targeted DNA sequencing was employed to characterize the somatic landscape. Clinical data was collected and summarized using descriptive statistics, and survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results We analyzed DNA methylation data of 65 tumor samples. Clustering analyses demonstrated DICER-1 CNS sarcomas segregate into two distinct epigenetic subgroups. Copy number analysis demonstrated frequent CNV alterations and chromothripsis in 35% of the samples. DICER-1 mutations were present in 85% of cases and associated with frequent additional alterations in TP53 (65%) and KRAS (51%). The median age at diagnosis was 10.4 years (r: 0.4 - 71 y) and 52% (n = 34) of subjects were male. Tumors were frequently (91%) located in the supratentorial compartment, frontal lobe involvement was noted in 62% of cases. Patients were treated with multimodal approaches including surgery, ICE chemotherapy, and focal radiation. At median follow-up time of 27.5 months, the 2-year progression-free and overall survival was 50.8% (r: 0.31-0.67) and 53.5% (r: 0.34-0.69) respectively. Conclusions DICER-1 CNS Sarcoma is an aggressive entity that segregates into two epigenetic subgroups, clinical and genotype correlations remain to be elucidated. Current multimodal approaches are only effective in a subset of patients. The identification of MAPK pathway alterations in most cases should be explored as a therapeutic avenue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it