Démarche autobiographique en petit groupe avec des jeunes en situation de raccrochage scolaire : une pédagogie des opprimé.e.s en travail social de groupe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente le récit réflexif d’une expérimentation d’une démarche autobiographique en petit groupe (DAPG) menée en 2019 avec un groupe de jeunes adultes en situation de raccrochage scolaire. Ce groupe était animé au moyen d’une approche d’éducation populaire par des travailleurs.euses communautaires d’un organisme communautaire autonome, le Bureau de consultation jeunesse. Les retombées et les limites de cette démarche sont analysées sous l’angle des idées fortes de la pédagogie des opprimé.e.s de Freire et de la méthodologie du travail social de groupe. Ce bilan réflexif permet, d’une part, de concevoir la DAPG comme une méthode spécifique en travail social de groupe et, d’autre part, de discuter des défis de la mise en action des concepts de la pédagogie des opprimé.e.s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".