Impacts of Climate Change on Mammalian Habitats in the Amazon Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study summarizes the multiple impacts of climate change on mammal habitats in the Amazon Basin and explores the ecological impacts of factors such as forest structure degradation, microclimate change, and wetland and flooded forest shrinkage on mammal populations. The results show that climate change has led to significant changes in the distribution range of mammals, fluctuations in population dynamics, and reduced reproductive success, further disturbing the ecological interaction network. In addition, the interaction between climate change and land use change has increased the risk of disease transmission, posing an overlapping ecological threat to mammals. Case analysis shows that key groups such as primates, large carnivores, and rodents have shown sensitive responses to habitat changes. Based on these findings, this study proposes adaptive management recommendations such as strengthening the connectivity of protected area networks and habitats, implementing dynamic conservation planning based on climate prediction, strengthening community participation and local knowledge integration, and establishing ecological monitoring and data sharing mechanisms. This study highlights the sensitivity of Amazon mammal habitats to climate change and calls for global cooperation to integrate climate science and ecological management practices to alleviate the pressure on mammal habitats in the Amazon region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".