Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plodia interpunctella (H ü bner, [1813]) COMMON NAME(S): Indian meal moth. Grain moth, Flour moth, Pantry moth, Weevil moth, North American high-flyer, Indian meal moth, Indian meal moth, Indian Meal Moth, or Indian-Meal Moth. SYNONYM(S): Tinea zeae Fitch, 1856; Plodia castaneella Reutti, 1898; Unadilla latercula Hampson, 1901a; Ephestia glycinivora Matsumura, 1917; Plodia americana Piutti, 1920; Ephestia glycinivorella Matsumura, 1932. IUCN STATUS: Not Evaluated (NE). DISTRIBUTION: Albania, Algeria, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada (British Columbia), Comoros, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Denmark (Faroe Islands), Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Greenland, Hawaii, Hispaniola, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Réunion, Romania, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro (Serbia), Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, USA, Zambia. LOCALITY IN ZAMBIA: Lusaka, in Lusaka Province. LARVAL HOSTPLANT(S): A cosmopolitan stored products pest. Can infest a wide range of dry foodstuffs of vegetable origin, such as cereal, bread, pasta, rice, couscous, flour, spices or dried fruits and nuts. More unusual recorded foods include chocolate and cocoa beans, coffee substitute, cookies, dried mangelwurzel, and even the toxic seeds of Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium). The food they infest will often seem to be webbed together. SOURCES: De Milliano 1983; De Prins & De Prins 2022; Zambia Quarantine Act 1973.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.093 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".