MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7135071932 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18973868

ICT Infrastructural Evolution and Economic Expansion in Ethiopia: A Comprehensive Analysis

2012· article· en· W7135071932 on OpenAlexaff
Wondimu Debella, Mekonnen Teklehaimove, Yonas Abebere

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyInvestment (military)Diversification (marketing strategy)EstimationPer capitaGovernment (linguistics)Panel dataEconometric model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure in Ethiopia has been a focal point for economic growth strategies. With significant investment in ICT, there is an increasing need to understand its impact on various sectors. The analysis employs econometric techniques to examine the relationship between ICT investment and GDP growth. Data from the Ethiopian Bureau of Statistics are used for regression analysis. A preliminary finding suggests that an increase in ICT investments by $10 per capita leads to a 2% rise in GDP, with robust standard errors indicating statistical significance. The study concludes that substantial investment in ICT infrastructure has positively influenced economic growth in Ethiopia. Recommendations for future policy include sustained funding and diversification of digital services. Policy recommendations include continued government support for ICT development, particularly in rural areas, to ensure equitable access and further stimulate economic expansion. ICT Infrastructure, Economic Growth, Telecommunications, Digital Services Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicICT Impact and Policies→French-language works237,207→