MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low-Cost UAV-Based Air Quality and Temperature Monitoring System

2025· article· W7135074690 on OpenAlexaff
Fardin Kabir, Fariz Syafiq Mohamad Ali, Mardeni Roslee, Mohd Shahrieel Mohd Aras, Fahmid Kabir, Sharfi Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Air pollutionAir quality indexAir temperatureTemperature measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an economical UAV system that performs real-time environmental monitoring, including air quality and temperature measurements. The system comprises a Grove multichannel gas sensor and a DHT11 temperature and humidity sensor, which operate under ESP32 microcontroller control, along with a LoRa module for extended-range, low-power data transmission within a 228-gram payload. The system utilizes a local IP-based IoT dashboard to display real-time data, eliminating the need for cellular or cloud connectivity. The system demonstrated its ability to detect spatial and vertical environmental patterns through field tests, which measured gas sensor indices and temperature and humidity profiles in residential, industrial, and academic areas at heights up to 25 meters. The proposed system enables scalable urban air-quality monitoring through commercial UAVs without requiring any infrastructure. The system will receive future improvements through sensor calibration, GPS-based geotagging, and the integration of PM<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2.5</inf> and O<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</inf> sensing modules to enhance measurement accuracy and system functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207