MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135078192 · doi:10.15699/tc.23.2018.10

Ernst Würthwein and Alexander Achilles Fischer, The Text of the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Biblia Hebraica

2018· article· en· W7135078192 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew W. Dyck

Bibliographic record

VenueTC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMistakeInterpretation (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fischer, the one continuing Wrthwein's legacy, is a professor of Old Testament at Friedrich Schiller University in Jena.Returning to a commentary on the present volume, while maintaining the ethos of Wrthwein's Der Text des Alten Testaments and previous editions of The Text of the Old Testament, the third edition boasts an assortment of new content reflecting recent biblical and extrabiblical archeological discoveries and the development of the Biblia Hebraica Quinta, new volumes in the Gttingen Septuagint, as well as an edition of the Antiochene texts of the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles, to list a few.All this has resulted in Fischer's near one-hundred-page expansion.As the present review engages with a revised volume, I give my attention to Fischer's expansions and revisions, which I summarize momentarily, while encouraging the reader to direct him or herself to other articles addressing the first and second editions for a summary of the remaining content.[2]To summarize the revisions and expansions, there are three changes to the section "Plates" (207-303).First, the Izbet Sartah abecedary has been eliminated.Second, plate 1 is now the Tel Dan inscription (208-9), discovered in 1996 that contains reference to the "house of David."Third, plate 15 is a fragment of Ecclesiastes discovered at Qumran (236-37).Otherwise, a selection of plate photographs has been improved.Concerning plate descriptions, when necessary, Fischer has edited, expanded, or adapted these descriptions to include subsequent developments in recent research since the publication of the previous edition.Also, added below each plate's caption is a brief identification of the manuscript or witness that includes its designated symbol, date, location, and a sample of the text.[3] Another improvement from the previous edition is the provision of selective topical bibliographies that follow each section.These bibliographies contain references to an assortment of significant research in Old Testament textual criticism that students and other interested people should be aware of.A more extensive bibliography remains at the end of the volume, though it is not topically divided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTC A Journal of Biblical Textual CriticismSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207