Waterfilling at The Edge: Optimal Percentile Resource Allocation Via Risk-Averse Reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We address deterministic resource allocation in point-to-point multiterminal AWGN channels without inter-terminal interference, with particular focus on optimizing quantile transmission rates for celledge terminal service. Classical utility-based approaches -such as minimum rate, sumrate, and proportional fairness- are either overconservative, or inappropriate, or do not provide a rigorous and/or interpretable foundation for fair rate optimization at the edge. To overcome these challenges, we employ Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), a popular coherent risk measure, and establish its equivalence with the sum-least- $\alpha$ th-quantile (SL $\alpha \mathrm{Q}$) utility. This connection enables an exact convex reformulation of the SL $\alpha \mathrm{Q}$ maximization problem, facilitating analytical tractability and precise and interpretable control over cell-edge terminal performance. Utilizing Lagrangian duality, we provide (for the first time) parameterized closed-form solutions for the optimal resource policy -which is of waterfilling-type-, as well as the associated (auxiliary) Value-atRisk variable. We further develop a novel inexact dual subgradient descent algorithm of minimal complexity to determine globally optimal resource policies, and we rigorously establish its convergence. The resulting edge waterfilling algorithm iteratively and efficiently allocates resources while explicitly ensuring transmission rate fairness across (cell-edge) terminals. Several (even large-scale) numerical experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method for enabling robust quantile rate optimization at the edge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".