MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135099488 · doi:10.35242/rde_2026_41_5

Prohibición del ejercicio al sufragio de la persona extranjera en Costa Rica: análisis jurídico

2024· article· es· W7135099488 on OpenAlexaff
Blanco Gamboa Mauricio

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Derecho Electoral · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdministrative Law and Governance
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Indigenous Peoples' Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonaPhysical activityContext (archaeology)Free access

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En la Constitución Política de 1949, Costa Rica incluyó la prohibición a las personas extranjeras de intervenir en asuntos políticos del país. Sin embargo, con el paso del tiempo, el avance de los procesos de globalización y los cambios legales que se han dado, principalmente en elecciones municipales, se plantea la necesidad de valorar esta prohibición en la actualidad. Con este fin, en un primer artículo de esta serie se analizaron casos de derecho comparado y antecedentes históricos. Se concluyó que es necesario profundizar| en un análisis jurídico sobre el concepto de soberanía y cómo se aplica al ejercicio de actividades políticas en el país. Esta segunda entrega realiza este análisis y concluye que la prohibición existente limita derechos fundamentales de personas extranjeras de manera injustificada, principalmente en lo relacionado a la participación política en asuntos municipales que no se vinculan al ejercicio de la soberanía nacional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Derecho ElectoralSame topicAdministrative Law and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207