MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135135648 · doi:10.5376/ijmec.2025.15.0029

Genomic Evolutionary Uniqueness of Pineapple: CAM Photosynthesis, Chromosomal Rearrangement, and Gene Duplication Clusters

2025· article· W7135135648 on OpenAlex
Zhen Li, Zhonggang Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Ecology and Conservation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPineapple and bromelain studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene duplicationGeneGenomeSegmental duplicationDiversification (marketing strategy)Gene familyHuman evolutionary geneticsPhylogeneticsStructural variation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study systematically analyzes recent research progress on the pineapple (Ananas comosus) genome, focusing on three key evolutionary features: the transition from C3 to CAM photosynthesis, chromosomal rearrangements, and the evolution of gene duplication clusters. Major findings indicate that during its evolutionary history, pineapple underwent limited whole-genome duplication events, retained a relatively conserved karyotype of seven chromosomes, and achieved functional gene expansion and diversification through segmental duplications and chromosomal structural rearrangements. By constructing an integrated framework of pineapple genome evolution, this study provides both theoretical foundations and practical guidance for future research on monocot evolution and the molecular breeding of crops with enhanced stress tolerance traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it