MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135162403

Geo-Emotions Cartography: Immersive psychogeography lived experience

2023· article· en· W7135162403 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Wacta

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindsetGeospatial analysisClass (philosophy)WeavingParticipatory designCitizen journalismArchitectureQualitative researchQualitative propertyUrban planning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An AI approach for DE-coding subjective qualitative data into a quantitative system of information network Geo-Emotions Cartography is a participatory mapping initiative that uses geospatial tools with AI capability to collect and spatialise the intangible activities of humans (traces-emotions-feedback). The collected data represents a layer of user-lived experiences missing in urban design processes and is necessary to improve the development of human-centred design solutions. This paper presents the pedagogical approach used in a human-centred design course—an entry-level undergraduate class in the Interior Architecture and Design school. The course activities are inspired by the psychogeography concept described by Guy-Ernest Debord (1956) in Théorie de la Dérive. While la dérive [the drift] involves a low-tech, playful-constructive behaviour by participants, with an awareness of psycho-geographical effects, the Geo-Emotions capture takes a novel approach of meshing objective, high-tech big-data with subjective, low-tech, ephemeral, loosely human data that is prone to individual bias, judgment, and opinion, i.e., personal-cultural-religious. The proposal supports both city planning processes and the design of related systems—transportation, communication, and green infrastructure—with a qualitative human behavioural information system network. This pedagogical trial mirrors the systemic methods by weaving together tensions and contradictions, i.e., the result of human emotions, with science to cause the hidden attributes with their inherent relationships to emerge as complex systems for new research in human geography as subtopics of urban design. It further explores the gamified principles of la dérive theory and instils a constructivist-cognitive mindset in the students and participants. Through this process, the development of the systems of thoughts and understanding is driven by the student’s engagement with the community, and the individual’s efforts to understand one’s relationship to the environment results in cognitive development that creates a heightened collective learning experience shared back into the classroom. The students involved in this process have no prior experience with geospatial tools or analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)Same topicSpatial Cognition and NavigationFrench-language works237,207