Full Project for Human Settlement, the Care of Interdependencies, the Responsibility of the Common Good
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Outlining scenarios of the new possible as a propaedeutics to the systemic project and for complexity A hypothesis of didactic exercise as a utopia acted, which roots in the student in thinking in systems on the “human project”, and goes beyond the dimension of the individual project towards the realisation of a project that operates on the care of interdependencies. This a project of relationships for social cohesion or for the possibility of giving rise to an awareness of the self-activating participation in reality, and of the other from oneself and from us. Examples of narration of the possible of becoming a civil community are proposed as urban places to experience the relationship in the dimension of maximum heterogeneity. Projects for a didactic were to experience complex relationships. Concepts of technological artefacts and personal services (collective being) are presented, favouring social aggregation dynamics and enabling a dimension of co-responsibility of the system’s users. The research activity was developed with first-year Communication and Product and Service Design students (Master of Systemic Design).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".