MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135193237 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19006609

Elevating Efficiency: A Technological Framework for Smart City Initiatives in High-Rise Residential Towers of Addis Ababa, 2013 Context

2013· article· en· W7135193237 on OpenAlexaff
Hanna Bezabih, Mekonnen Gebru Tekle, Yared Gebreab

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Smart cityConsumption (sociology)Energy consumptionElectricityScale (ratio)Efficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the implementation of smart city initiatives within high-rise residential towers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, with a particular emphasis on reducing energy consumption. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating surveys with sensor data analysis to assess the impact of smart city technologies on energy consumption patterns. Statistical models were used to predict future trends in energy use based on current data. Initial findings suggest that a 15% reduction in electricity usage can be achieved through the implementation of smart lighting and HVAC systems, with a significant increase in user satisfaction noted across all surveyed households (n=200). The technological framework demonstrates potential for reducing energy consumption while improving user experience. Recommendations are provided to further refine and scale these technologies. Further research is recommended to validate the findings through longitudinal studies, and policy recommendations should prioritise funding for smart city infrastructure in high-rise residential areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207