MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7135225862 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf135

La Loi 79 et la vérité pour les enfants autochtones disparus ou décédés : enjeux pour la pédiatrie et le devoir de mémoire

2025· article· en· W7135225862 on OpenAlexaffabout
Claude Cyr, Apolline Coën

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Child pornographyVetting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adoptée en 2021, la Loi 79 du Québec autorise la communication de renseignements personnels à des familles autochtones dont les enfants ont disparu ou sont décédés après une admission dans un établissement de santé entre les années 1950 et 1980. Cette législation vise à répondre à la douleur de familles privées d'information pendant des décennies. Cet article présente le contexte historique de cette loi, les données médicales tirées des dossiers traités, le rôle des professionnel·le·s de la santé, et le travail de mémoire mené par l'association autochtone Awacak dans une démarche de vérité, de guérison et de transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→