Colour conservation of the New Zealand Guardian Trust building
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hoggard, Prouse, and Gummer was an architectural firm that started in 1913 in Wellington, New Zealand. The partners were John Hoggard, William Prouse, and William Henry Gummer. One of their notable buildings was the “New Zealand Insurance” building, later known as the “Guardian Trust Building” in Queen Street, Auckland. This marble clad structure was modelled on turn-of-the-century commercial American buildings in what has been called a “stripped-down Classical” style. It was one of Auckland’s first high-rise office blocks and marked the transition between the previously Victorian styled commercial buildings and the later “glass and steel Modern” office buildings. It was built during the First World War as the headquarters of the New Zealand Insurance Company (NZI), and is still important as the earliest remaining high-rise office block in Auckland. Listed by the Heritage New Zealand as Category One Historic Place, the NZI building is widely recognised for its architectural value in the country’s architectural historiography. Currently, the building comprises apartments ranging from studios to penthouses, as well as commercial spaces. This research builds upon the widely recognised significance of this important example of architecture in New Zealand further contextualising the colours used here with other colours used by William Gummer (within his other architectural firm: Gummer Ford), and outlines a proposal for the conservation of its colours in the near future. The methodology of the study involves a literature review and archival research (historic photos and drawings) as well as on-site analyses. The latter involve the identification of the building colour palette (façade and interiors) by using the NCS Colourpin SE tool. The Colour reference codes follow the NCS 1950 chart and equivalent RGB values. The colours identified are also compared with archive material to better understand its original setting. The final colour palette will be useful to practitioners for any future conservation of this important example of early New Zealand’s 20th Century architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".