MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135403675 · doi:10.18416/automed.2026.2474

Usability and acceptance of an upper-limb exosuit in the home environment

2025· article· en· W7135403675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adrian Esser, Celine Ly, Peter Wolf, Robert Riener

Bibliographic record

VenueInfinite Science GmbH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsabilitySystem usability scalePluralistic walkthroughWeb usabilityUsability goalsUsability labSoftware deploymentCognitive walkthrough

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exosuits show promise for daily assistance, yet real-world usability studies are scarce. A 14-day home study evaluated the usability and acceptance of the Myoshirt for an individual with Bethlem Myopathy, marking its first deployment without a supervising expert. Questionnaires including the System Usability Scale and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology were collected. Results indicated good usability (SUS = 70) but low satisfaction (QUEST = 2.25). Critical issues included difficulties with donning, discomfort, and concerns regarding aesthetics. The preliminary findings highlight the necessity of designing exosuits for independent, long-term use to achieve higher user acceptance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfinite Science GmbHSame topicAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityFrench-language works237,207