Problems of sacrality and of sacral space in the writings of some church authorities around 1600
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis written in the course of the author's residence in Rome analyses concepts of the sacral space in some writings of the Church authorities selected according to their spread and influentiality, with the ambition to revert their interpretation to their contemporary backgrounds, which was hitherto often interpretated unilaterally under the prism of angling simplifications. In the last quarter of the 16th century there appear some new genres in the literature dealing with sacral architecture or on the contrary, there is a new way of approaching of the thematisation of the sacral architecture into the Church tractatistics. The most complete treatise of sacral architecture coming from the Church circles are the Instructiones fabricae (15770 of Charles of Borromeo. In spite of existing literature, the analysis of these rules denotes author's firm grounds in the tradition of humanistic tractatistcs. The next chapter reflects the discussion of participants of the Trident Council and its emphasis on the visual moments leading to the deepening of the interpretation of principal change in the conception of the sacral space, namely the translation of the tabernacle on the main axis of the church. ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".