Parishes in the Tábor region from the perspective of preparatory writings for the Theresian Cadastre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this bachelor's thesis is to process cultural and historical data from spiritual preparatory writings, located in the National Archives in Prague, in the files of the Theresian Cadastre for the Tábor region from the first quarter of the 18th century. The preparatory writings were meant to improve taxation and the creation of a new Teresian cadastre. Focus of the thesis is on examining the condition of the local parishes, their extent according to the number of parishioners, the condition of parish and branch churches or chapels and the distance of villages from the church. Attention is also paid to the relations between priests, parishioners and lords. Separate chapters concern parish schools, hospitals or fraternities and literary fraternities. The thesis is supplemented by the financial and economic side of parishes, including permanent and incidental salaries of clergy, the composition of the parish economy and the equipment of churches. Keywords Theresian cadastre, spiritual preparatory writing (duchovní tabela), parishes, parish schools, fraternities, literary fraternities, baroque hospitals, Tábor region, Bechyně region
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".