MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135450502

A study on the microstructural characteristics of 3D printed 316l stainless steel by selective laser melting

2024· article· en· W7135450502 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C S Kirk, Adrian; id_orcid 0000-0003-3477-3645 Murphy, Chi Wai; id_orcid 0000-0003-4953-1024 Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsSelective laser meltingMicrostructure3d printedWork (physics)PorosityLaserComponent (thermodynamics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metal AM market is tipped to undergo relentless growth in the coming years, with an expected market increase from $2.9 billion USD in 2022 to $15.0 billion USD in 2032. The ability to direct-manufacture complex porous structures is a powerful tool. Paired with the ability to produce patient-specific metallic implants without the need for specialised tooling, it is obvious that AM can positively transform the industry. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is one method currently used to produce metallic AM components and will be the sole manufacturing method explored in this work. SLM is a complex manufacturing process, with over 100 parameters affecting component quality. This work focuses on investigating the microstructure and defects present within samples of 316L Stainless Steel manufactured by SLM. The findings will be used to explain the difference in fatigue performance between SLM and wrought 316L, which is currently work in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast)Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207