MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135458100

The Reflection of the Ecclesiastical Environment of the Last Quarter of the14th Century in the Works of the Master of Trebon Altarpiece

2021· dissertation· cs· W7135458100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Kanaloš

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAltarpieceVenerationPaintingQuarter (Canadian coin)CultReflection (computer programming)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis deals with the ecclesiastical environment of the last quarter of the14th century which reflects in the works of the Master of Trebon Altarpiece. In the Trebon Altarpiece it is visible the reflection of the devotio moderna movement, and the body and blood of Christ adoration. In another work of the Master of Trebon Altarpiece The Roudnice Madonna the veneration of the Virgin Mary and the relic of peplum cruentatum (the Virgin Mary's stained veil of Christ's blood) is highlighted. This veneration is also expressed in the painting of the workshop of the Master of Trebon Altarpiece Madonna Aracoeli. Jan of Jenstein (1350-1400) deeply venerated the Virgin Mary. He contributed in propagation of her cult and it is possible that he had an influence on The Master of Trebon Altarpiece, and he could be even the one who ordered paintings from the Master of Trebon Altarpiece. Key words: Master of Trebon Altarpiece, Trebon Altarpiece, Canons Regular of St. Augustin, John of Jenstein, 14th century panel painting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207