MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135478826

PROSPERO: Interventions to improve linear growth during exclusive breastfeeding period for children aged 0-6 months living in low- and middle-income countries:a systematic review and network and pairwise meta-analyses

2018· other· en· W7135478826 on OpenAlexaff
Mei Lan  ; id_orcid 0000-0003-1990-7537 Fang, Jay Park, Ofir Harari, Louis Dron, Reham Majzoub, Richard Lester, Kristian Thorlund, Edward Joseph Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingPsychological interventionPairwise comparisonPeriod (music)MEDLINELinear growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROSPERO is produced by CRD and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)French-language works237,207