Record W7135480887

Zionism and Jewish emancipation within Europe

2022· book-chapter· en· W7135480887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

A. Roosen

Bibliographic record

VenueUvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · 2022

Typebook-chapter

Languageen

FieldSocial Sciences

TopicJewish Identity and Society

Canadian institutionsnot available

Fundersnot available

KeywordsZionismJudaismState (computer science)EmancipationPoliticsJewish stateSettlement (finance)Palestine

DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Historical background and context Jewish Population map of the Jewish Pale of Settlement (Russian Empire) and Congress Poland Roosen, André <div class="body text_tags" data-command_hover="y:ui_data:hover_object-0"> Jewish political consciousness-raining in Eastern Europe was spurred on by the anti-Semitism and the pogroms that were unleashed after the murder of Alexander II in 1881. In Katowice (then under Prussian rule, and outside Tsarist reach) a Jewish federation was formed in 1884 called Hovevei Zion (“Lovers of Zion”). They chose for their headquarters the city of Odessa, with Leon Pinsker (1821–1891) as president. Pinsker had published a brochure in 1882 advocating self-government and the establishment of an autonomous territorial state (Autoemancipation! Mahnruf an seine Stammesgenossen von einem russischen Juden, 1882). It was left open whether such a self-governing territory should be located in Palestine or in the United States – at the time a mass exodus towards the US was gathering steam which between 1880 and 1930 would total 1,750,000 Russian-Jewish migrants. Almost all of them were Yiddish speakers from the so-called Pale of Settlement, the western provinces and borderlands of the Russian Empire which had been allotted as the only place where Jews could freely take up residence. Establishing a new territorial autonomy outside the Russian Empire, already a concern for Moses Hess, was most influentially propounded by Theodor Herzl, born in Budapest but living in Vienna and working as a journalist in Paris, in his Der Judenstaat: Versuch einer modernen Lösing der Judenfrage (1896). Herzl organized the First Zionist Congress in 1897; the second one, in 1898, established a financial institution in London, the Jewish Colonial Trust, to finance Zionist activities, as well as the Anglo-Palestine Bank, later renamed Bank Leumi. The territorial focus here was on settlement in Palestine, and with additional support from sponsors like Rothschild, a first wave of migrants moved to that area from 1882 on. Even so, other options were envisaged. In the US, a Jewish “city of refuge”, named Ararat, had been tentatively established near the Niagara Falls in 1825; Herzl himself had considered the possibility of Argentina, where the philanthropist Maurice von Hirsch had financed Jewish settlements; Cyprus, the Sinai peninsula, Suriname, Tasmania and Madagascar were occasionally discussed, as well as various British colonies. Uganda was briefly seen as a serious option, and defended by Herzl on the Third Zionist Congress in 1903. When, following Herzl’s death, the 1905 congress definitively opted for Palestine, Israel Zangwill left the movement in protest and founded a rival Jewish Territorialist Organisation. The first wave of settlement in Palestine elicited debate and conflicting viewpoints from various quarters. On the right, there was Revisionist Zionism, headed by the Russian activist Ze’ev (born Vladimir) Jabotinsky (1880–1940) and inspired by Max Nordau’s Nietzschean ideas on Muskeljudentum (“muscular Jewry”); it favoured armed self-defence against anti-Semitism and, later, a militant appropriation of Palestinian land for the establishment of a Jewish state. More on the left, and led initially by Herzl’s successor Chaim Weizmann (Motal 1874 – Rehovot 1949), an approach took hold that eschewed the backing of imperial powers and relied instead on labour collectives such as kibbutzes and cooperative societies. This approach dominated the second wave of migration to Palestine (1904-14), during which the Palestine Land Development Company and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem were established. Within Russia, many leftist Jewish activists disapproved of Zionism altogether as a capitalist-backed bourgeois movement; this was the position of the Bund (Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter-bund in Lite, Poyln un Rusland, founded in 1917), which also preferred Yiddish to revived Hebrew as the language of Jewish identity. Others developed a socialist “workers’ Zionism”: Nachman Syrkin (Mogilev 1868 – New York 1924), Ber Boročov (Zolotonosha 1881 – Kiev 1917), founder of the Poale Zion (“Workers of Zion”) and Aharon David Gordon (Zhytomyr region 1856 – kibbutz Degania 1922), Tolstoyan and driving force behind the kibbutz movement with his organization Hapoel Hatzair (“The Young Worker”). This attitude was strongly represented in the second migration wave, which was triggered by the Kishinev pogrom of 1903 and the anti-Semitic unrest following the failed revolution of 1905. Of the total Jewish population of Palestine, numbering 85,000 in 1914, 25,000 had immigrated from Russia after 1904. Among them was David Ben-Gurion (born Grün, Plońsk 1886 – Ramat Gan 1973), who founded a social-democratic breakaway party from Boročev’s Poale Zion in 1919. By this time the Jewish community in Palestine had opted firmly for Hebrew, not Yiddish, as their common language, and in 1909 had founded an armed defence organization, Hashomer (“The Watchman”). Within Europe, Russian-Jewish activists established a territorialist movement, aimed at safeguarding a Jewish identity without necessarily settling in a Palestinian homeland, and preferring the use of Yiddish over Hebrew. Those who, like Simon Dubnow, were repelled by Bolshevism, relocated their activities to the West (Berlin and Vilnius), founding the Yidisher Visnshaftlekher Institut (YIVO) in Vilnius in 1925 as an alternative to Leopold Zunz’s more Western Wissenschaft des Judentums movement. Within Russia, the Yiddishist critic and thinker Chaim Žitlovskij (nr Vitebsk 1865 – Calgary 1943) had founded the Socialist Jewish Workers’ Party in 1906. Žitlovskij’s culture-political programme dovetailed class and ethnicity, in the style of Austro-Marxism; this approach was repressed after the rise of Stalin, who (while occasionally and capriciously evincing sympathy for the cultural diversity of the Soviet Union) felt that Judaism, religion-based as it largely was, was fundamentally reactionary. A Jewish Commissariat was established in 1917, which opposed Zionism (even its socialist variant) and the revival of Hebrew; but Jewish organizations were successively dismantled after 1925, and Russia’s Jews were forcibly dissuaded from their traditional trades to become “productive” labourers. Calls for a separate homeland were still made, however. In the 1920s, Jewish settlements on the Crimea were planned and set in motion; by 1939, the Crimea and the adjacent areas of Southern Ukraine had circa 85,000 Jewish inhabitants. This led to considerable frictions with the area‘s Turkic-Islamic (“Tatar”) inhabitants, who had in recent decades been sensitized to their own ethnicity by the likes of Ismail Gasprinskij. An alternative was sought, and found in the extreme east of Siberia, between the Bira and Dižan tributaries of the Amur river on the border with China. The town of Birobidžan was founded in 1932 and became the capital of a separate province designated as a Jewish homeland. Of the area’s 100,000 inhabitants, 18,000 were Jewish by 1939. </div> Word Count: 992 <div class="body text_tags" data-command_hover="y:ui_data:hover_object-0"> In memoriam Arthur Mitzman, 1931–2021. </div> Word Count: 4 1.2.1.3/a <a href="https://e-rn.ie/jew-2" target="_blank">https://e-rn.ie/jew-2</a>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesnone

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none

GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other

Teacher disagreement score0.963

Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.001	0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.000	0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.000	0.000
Bibliometrics	0.000	0.000
Science and technology studies	0.001	0.001
Scholarly communication	0.000	0.000
Open science	0.000	0.000
Research integrity	0.000	0.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.003	0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022

GPT teacher head0.220

Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Meta-epidemiology (narrow)Science and technology studies Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Study designNot applicable

Domainnot available

GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2022

Admission routes1

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueUvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)→Same topicJewish Identity and Society→French-language works237,207→