MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135482133

Sensory characterization of conifer-based extracts in a culinary use perspective

2021· article· en· W7135482133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francois Girard, Afia Boumail, Katherine Tanaka, Michael Bom Frøst, Sylvie L. Turgeon, Véronique Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceration (sewage)Sensory analysisFlavourSensory system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wild foods have increased in popularity among Quebec’s chefs and the general public. Tree products, such as conifer needles and buds, are abundant resources that are very characteristic of Quebec’s forests. They are underutilized in culinary applications despite their great flavour potential.<br/><br/>The purpose of this study was to characterize the sensory properties of conifer-based extracts for culinary purposes. The extracts’ sensory properties were characterized by chefs and student chefs. In addition, suggestions for their culinary value were collected in order to further encourage the use of conifer products in cooking.<br/><br/>Needles and buds from three conifer species (Balsam fir, White spruce, Black spruce) were prepared following three methods: aqueous (maceration [4°C-48h], decoction [100°C-1min]) or lipid (sous-vide [55°C-90min]) extraction methods. Projective mapping combined with ultra-flash profiling was performed. Respondents specifically focused on odours and aromas. Culinary arts teachers and advanced students (n=21) evaluated 14 samples. Standard projective mapping data analysis methods (lemmatizing, semantic clustering) were applied, using R-packages (SensoMineR, FactoMineR and Factoshiny) for statistical procedures.<br/><br/>The descriptors were grouped based on categories from existing sensory vocabularies, and systematic differences between samples as a function of extraction method, tree part and tree species were seen (See figure). Lipid extracts were described with roasted, milky, fresh herbs notes and saltiness, while aqueous extracts were woodsy, resinous, earthy, bitter and astringent. Needles extracts were sweet, acidic with fruity and confectionery/pastry notes, whereas buds extracts were herbaceous (aromatic herbs, dry herbs, leaves).<br/><br/>Black spruce buds maceration and Balsam fir needles maceration were the most frequently identified to have good culinary potential, with 57 and 47% of participants, respectively. Varied proposals for culinary uses were collected, ranging from incorporation in an emulsion or a sauce to accompany halibut or duck, to use in a sorbet or a cranberry cocktail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207