Bibliographic record
Abstract
ANGLICKÁ ANOTACE A theme of the bachelor thesis is a live and work of art a Czech artist Olga Karlíková (1923-2004). Her work have not been lined up theoretically, and treating of her comprehensive monograph and listing her art-works in municipal and private hands is an incentive issue and deal for a renowned historian of art. The aim of my work is to partially contribute to exposure her work. A list of her works in municipal institutions hands is a part of the thesis. Olga Karlíková born in 1923 in Prague and there she live through her childhood. In 1948 she graduated at Academy of Arts, Architecture and Design in Prague, where she studied at Prof. Antonín Kybal (1901-1971), and she gained a stance on tapestry because of him. She worked in Ústav bytové a oděvní kultury - ÚBOK (Institute of Quarter and Dress Culture), where she used to design a quarter textile. She dedicated herself to tapestry the most. There used to be an open and creative atmosphere, and Jinrřich Chalupecký spent there a short episode, for example. Jiří and Daisy Mrázkovy were her long-time and close co-workers. Karlíková was a solitaire artist above all. She created without a support of collective programmes. She acted in a group Bilance for a short time, in totalitarian Czechoslovakia was a member of a Svaz Československých výtvarných...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".