Bibliographic record
Abstract
127 Trust in the context of inheritance law Abstract The subject matter of this doctoral viva voce dissertation are two fiduciary institutes brought into Czech private law by the new Civil Code effective from January 1, 2014 - i.e. the Trust Fund and the Trust Succession (Fideicommissary Substitution). The dissertation contains an analysis of the legislation in force applicable to both institutes concerned against the background of the historical development of fiduciary relations and a comparison of foreign legislations applicable to trust and fideicommissary substitution. The institute of Trust Succession has returned to Czech law after fifty years. In the case of a trust fund, which mixes elements of property and contractual law, it is the implementation of the traditional Anglo-Saxon legal institute into the Continental legal environment, which in itself brings a number of hermeneutical and application challenges. These challenges are highlighted by the concept chosen by the Czech legislator, which consists in following the Quebec model and constituting a depersonalized property allocated for a certain purpose. The focus of the dissertation is to confront the legislation governing the aforesaid fiduciary institutes with the provisions of the applicable inheritance law, in particular from the point of...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".