MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135499289

Expectations of a child entering the first grade of primary school

2025· dissertation· cs· W7135499289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jana Suvandžievová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisappointmentPhenomenonQuarter (Canadian coin)CurriculumFoundation StageWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is a probe into the issue of preschoolers' expectations and the phenomenon of disappointment of first grade students in the first quarter of compulsory schooling. The main aim of this investigation was to analyse the causes of the phenomenon of disappointment among pupils in the first grades of primary schools and to propose possible solutions that would help to prevent the loss of interest in school at the beginning of schooling. A secondary aim of the work was to identify repetitive activities within the educational practice of kindergartens and primary schools and to suggest ways to ensure continuity between these levels of education in order to avoid duplication in the forms and content of educational activities. The theoretical part focuses on the characteristics of preschool and younger school-age children, in particular their expected abilities, skills and knowledge. Furthermore, I focus on the analysis of the framework curricula for preschool and primary education. The practical part of the thesis responds to the specific research objectives concerning the phenomenon of disappointment in first grade pupils. The research was carried out through observations of work in kindergartens and primary schools, semi-structured interviews with preschool and first grade pupils, as well as...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207