MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135520245

Media image of Eichmann trial in chosen contemporary Czechoslovak and foreign press

2021· dissertation· cs· W7135520245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michala Repáňová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuardianContext (archaeology)EmigrationWorld War IIPeriod (music)Spanish Civil WarNazismForeign policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis deals with the life of Adolf Eichmann, his work in World War II and the media image of his trial, which took place in 1961 in Israel. The theoretical part of this thesis covers three chapters - Adolf Eichmann before World War II, Adolf Eichmann and his role in World War II (with subchapters "Expert in emigration and evacuation", "Transition to physical liquidation", "Eichmann, his work in Hungary and at the end of the war "), and Eichmann's abduction from Argentina. The theoretical part is supplemented by a brief chapter devoted to the contemporary context abroad and in Czechoslovakia. The practical part of the thesis aims to reflect on the Eichmann process in the chosen Czechoslovak and foreign press, which will be achieved through content and descriptive analysis. Relevant articles about Eichmann or his trial in the period April-August 1961, December 1961 and May 1962 will be examined. Czechoslovak dailies (Rudé právo, Práca) and foreign press (American dailies The New York Times and Daily News, British Guardian and the Daily Mirror, and the Canadian The Gazette) will be analysed. The practical part is supplemented by a brief chapter devoted to the court and its course. The aim of the analysis is to describe how the dailies reported on the process and Eichmann, whether they focused on...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicGerman History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207