MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7135527207

The Influence of Monetary Policy on Real Estate Market as a Potential Catalyst for Economic Crisis

2015· dissertation· cs· W7135527207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanislav Suský

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateInterest rateQuarter (Canadian coin)Point (geometry)Monetary policyWork (physics)Real interest ratePanel dataCapitalization rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis focuses on the influence of target interest rates set by central banks to stimulate property markets, in particular on the impact of these rates on real estate pricing and the subsequent bubbles in the housing market. In my work I analyse panel data portraying the quarterly performance of 29 European states from early 2000 till the end of second quarter of 2015. In the first part I investigate the influence of interest rates on property prices and find out that a one percentage point decrease of the target interest rate by the central bank resulted in a rise of 0.897 points in the house price index. In the second part I evaluate the impact of this instrument on the creation of a housing bubble, which is represented by the indicator of housing price sustainability. I estimate that an decrease in interest rates by one percentage point is concomitant with a increase of growth of the price bubble by 0,28 %. I thus validate my hypotheses on the negative correlation between the aforementioned variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)→Same topicHousing Market and Economics→French-language works237,207→