MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135532019

Elaboration of the theory and didactics of hockeyball and the methodology of its training at primary and secondary schools in the form of an instructional DVD

2023· dissertation· cs· W7135532019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miroslav RYCHLÍK

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffensiveElaborationCzechBachelorTraining (meteorology)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This bachelor thesis deals with a comprehensive analysis of the current hockeyball equipment, the systematics of hockeyball, its playing technique, and the methodology of individual playing activities in the form of a DVD video. Hockeyball is a relatively young sport and has evolved from the well-known ice hockey in Canada. In the Czech Republic it is currently played in organized competitions under the union of the Czech-Moravian Hockeyball Association. In schools, however, hockeyball is only encountered in the framework of the Hockeyball Against Drugs project, in the form of tournaments or clubs. Therefore, for many people the game is not very well known. This work should serve to make it more popular. The tutorial video will guide every fan through the game of hockeyball and prepare them for mastering the basic gameplay of an individual, both offensive and defensive, as well as outlining the goalkeeper's game. This didactic aid can be used for coaches as well as for physical education teachers of primary and secondary schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207