MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135545941

The Diamondway Buddhism in Czech Republic - the Past and the Present

2014· dissertation· cs· W7135545941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Milan Středa

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuddhismCzechContext (archaeology)MeditationAttendanceStyle (visual arts)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diploma thesis "Diamond Way Buddhism in Czech Republic - History and Presence: look into the life of community in the region of Olomouc" deals with a relatively new social phenomenon - foundation and development of centers of Diamond Way Buddhism in Czech Republic. We will concentrate on one of these buddhist communities connected to meditation center in Olomouc. This thesis contributes to knowledge of this buddhist style, its history, presence and dailiness. It focuses on creation, functioning and activities of this community. This thesis uses two methods to reach its goal. The first is to investigate available historical sources to put this community into the context of Czech, European and world Buddhism. The second method is oral history by which we can gain knowledge about yet unpublished information about organization, dailiness, habits and activities of a community. This thesis is also trying to find out what influence has regular attendance of community activities and the practitioning of this style of Buddhism on its members, their opinions on world and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207