MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135550178

Dancing for Dummies

2023· other· en· W7135550178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erica Eyres

Bibliographic record

VenueRADAR (Glasgow School of Art) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionPaintingDanceBeautyThe artsSculptureStyle (visual arts)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exhibition Dates: August 26 - October 7, 2023 Exhibition Venue: Centre for Cultural and Artistic Practices, Winnipeg, Canada Dancing For Dummies is a solo exhibition of paintings, ceramics, and performance video at Centre for Cultural and Artistic Practices, Winnipeg, Canada (26th August- 7th October 2023). The production and shipment of works was funded by Canada Council for the Arts and Centre for Cultural and Artistic Practices. The exhibition was by invitation of gallery director and curator Luther Konadu. Eyres’ paintings are based on “before” images found in beauty makeover manuals from the 1980s. Her methodology includes selecting, scanning, and editing these images before painting them in a realist manner on small scale (30 x 30 cm) canvases. These paintings are hung above a mantel-like shelf that outlines the gallery, displaying a series of ceramics works based on books (including a stack of For Dummies textbooks, Sweet Valley High books, ashtrays, a sandwich, a bowl of cereal, a box of matches). The ceramic sculptures are rendered by hand with realist detail to become corpse-like duplicates that evoke an ambiguous, psychological space that invites viewers to project their own narratives. In the basement, Eyres presents Learn to Dance, a single-channel video projection. The work emulates the format of a dance tutorial and features the artist in self-transformation as dance instructor and three students. Using greenscreen technology, the characters are set in a 1980s style doll house. The dialogue borrows language from a Learn to Lap-Dance VHS tape, self-help literature, ‘Lacan for Beginners’ and Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar. Eyres wrote, shot, edited, and performed all the characters. The exhibition was accompanied by a commissioned text by Alex Athea and reviewed by Rodney La Tourelle for the February 2024 edition of Art Review. A screening of early videos from Eyres was held at Winnipeg Film Group in collaboration with the gallery on 2nd September 2023. The exhibition was viewed by over 500 people and the screening was attended by 60 people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4370.127

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRADAR (Glasgow School of Art)French-language works237,207