Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Bachelor's Thesis is focused on the development, main function and characteristics of the Latin Quarter, which is a part of Paris and forms its historical nucleus. The 5 main chapters dissect the development of this cityscape, from ancient Lutetia to the present. Emphasis in placed on monuments and the progress of education in the Middle Ages; this Thesis is primarily concerned with medieval education in the age of its greatest blossoming. The Parisian university flourished in all regards; its specifics are highlighted. Further school institutions and the functioning of the local school system in the present are also mentioned. The Thesis provides a deeper look at the artists living and creating in the Latin Quarter as well as on locations connected to their lives and creations. The Latin Quarter remains a traditional center of cultural and intellectual life in Paris. The objective of this Thesis is to familiarize readers with the remarkable city Quarter along with all its specifics and specialities in an engaging and readable way, using the most trustworthy literary sources possible. KEYWORDS Paris, Lutetia, Latin Quarter, history, Middle Ages, education, university, Sorbona, artist, tourism
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".