MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135570885

Er vi europæere for alvor klar til at forsvare de værdier, vi tror på?

2022· article· da· W7135570885 on OpenAlexaff
Marlene Wind

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGovernment, Law, and Information Management
Canadian institutionsCentre for International Governance Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverContext (archaeology)European unionWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professor Marlene Wind skriver i denne klumme om, hvordan EU ufrivilligt er blevet en vigtig geopolitisk aktør, og om, hvordan vi gennem globaliseringen har lukket øjnene, når det passede os fx ift. afhængighed af russisk gas og tøjhandel produceret med børnearbejde i Asien. Hun efterspørger, at EU så lever op til dets ansvar og aktivt forsvarer de værdier, vi siger, vi tror på.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5660.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicGovernment, Law, and Information ManagementFrench-language works237,207