The formation of a working-class district in Malvazinky in the first half of the 20th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Klíčová slova (anglicky): Worker colony, Malvazinky, Smíchov, construction, cooperatives Abstract (in English): The bachelor thesis deals with the formation and shaping of the Prague working-class quarter in Malvazinky in the first half of the 20th century. Its main aim is to present the construction of family houses that were created as a result of the housing shortage in Prague. The main builders were building and housing cooperatives and also the Prague municipality. It was mainly an attempt to build cheap but quality housing for a wider segment of the population. The thesis is devoted to a description of the site, an introduction to the building and housing co- operatives and their building activities, and a characterisation of the Prague workforce, which was increasing in number. It uses maps and plans showing the site and plans of the proposed houses to give a complete picture. There was an emergency colony on the site earmarked for development, to which the thesis devotes a chapter. A number of colonists agreed to form their own cooperative, which is also discussed in the thesis. The result of the thesis is a comprehensive presentation of the area of Prague Malvazinky and a comprehensive view of its development in the 1920s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".