Bibliographic record
Abstract
(in English) The life and work of academically trained sculptor Miloslav Hejný (1925 - 2013) has not hitherto been submited to a complex examination or otherwise underwent any literary research. This thesis is the first attempt at a summary of the first half of creative life of an unknown author, a nearly twenty-year period between 1955 and 1973, a commented biography with an accompanying introduction and appendix as to his education, the initial professional experiences with the official regime production of visual art, and the second quarter of the 70s, when Hejný's spacial art forms deliberately ceased. Biographical chapters are interrupted by excursions into the parallel happenings of the artists' community, contemporary developments in form and style, the works of his friends and collaborators, and up to date or otherwise relevant theory. Out of the hinted-at phenomena, neorealism, postwar receptions of cubism, minimalism as a moral concept, the sculptors Vladimír and Věra Janouškovi, Stanislav Kolíbal, Vladimír Preclík, and the groups Máj 57, Trasa and UB 12, or the theory of creative thought of Gaston Bachelard will be mentioned. Nominally popular in the sense of the first publication of data, the thesis maintains a profile of a synthetic biographical study. For that reason it does not...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".