MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135617871

Debat: Populismen i Europa vil ikke svækkes af et farvel til Trump

2020· article· da· W7135617871 on OpenAlexaff
Marlene Wind

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPopulism, Right-Wing Movements
Canadian institutionsCentre for International Governance Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Work (physics)Field (mathematics)Action (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marlene Wind skriver om den illiberale bølge i Europa, og sammenligner denne med den populistiske bølge i USA, som Trump repræsenterer. Her påpeger hun, at den Europæiske bølge reflekterer endnu mere grundlæggende angreb på det liberale demokrati, end hvad vi ser i USA under Trump. Eksempelvis udfordres domstolenes og mediernes uafhængighed flere steder på kontinentet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3190.114

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsFrench-language works237,207