MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7135628146

Paleogene Newfoundland sediment drifts : 1 June - 30 July 2012; preliminary report / Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 342. Expedition 342 scientists: Richard D. Norris ... Oliver Friedrich ...

2012· article· en· W7135628146 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Expedition 342 Scientists IODP, Richard D. Norris, Oliver Friedrich, Amit Kumar Ghosh, Christopher J. Hollis, Pincelli M. Hull, Kyoungnam Jo, Christopher K. Junium, Masanori Kaneko, Diederik Liebrand, Peter C. Lippert, Zhonghui Liu, Paul A. Wilson, Hiroki Matsui, Kazuyoshi Moriya, Hiroshi Nishi, Bradley N. Opdyke, Donald E. Penman, Brian Romans, Howie D. Scher, Philip F. Sexton, Haruka Takagi, Sandra Kirtland Turner, Peter Blum, Jessica H. Whiteside, Tatsuhiko Yamaguchi, Yuhji Yamamoto, Annick Fehr, Claudia Agnini, André Bornemann, Slah Boulila, Paul R. Bown, C. Cournède

Bibliographic record

VenueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreliminary reportDrillingPaleogeneSedimentProspection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IODP, Expedition 342 Scientists; Norris, Richard D.; Wilson, Paul A.; Blum, Peter; Fehr, Annick; Agnini, Claudia; Bornemann, André; Boulila, Slah; Bown, Paul R.; Cournede, Cecile; Friedrich, Oliver; Ghosh, Amit Kumar; Hollis, Christopher J.; Hull, Pincelli M.; Jo, Kyoungnam; Junium, Christopher K.; Kaneko, Masanori; Liebrand, Diederik; Lippert, Peter C.; Liu, Zhonghui; Matsui, Hiroki; Moriya, Kazuyoshi; Nishi, Hiroshi; Opdyke, Bradley N.; Penman, Donald; Romans, Brian; Scher, Howie D.; Sexton, Philip; Takagi, Haruka; Turner, Sandra Kirtland; Whiteside, Jessica H.; Yamaguchi, Tatsuhiko; Yamamoto, Yuhji

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)→Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→