Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Current issues of international carriage by air Abstract The topic of this diploma thesis is Current issues of international carriage by air. Certainly, many interesting legal topics could be found within this theme, however the author chose to focus specifically on the concrete issue of air carrier liability for passenger injuries pursuant to Article 17 of Warsaw Convention and Article 17 (1) of the Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air. The thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter presents the legal framework for the regulation of international private aviation law. The individual legal sources of the Warsaw System and the Montreal Convention, their scope and relations between these sources and the law of the European Union are presented. The second chapter deals in general with the liability of the air carrier under the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions. It defines the types of air carrier's liability covered by these conventions, the limits of air carrier's liability and the procedural aspects of the recovery of claims under the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions. In the third chapter, the author writes about the air carrier's liability for passenger injuries under the Warsaw and Montreal Convention, with a focus on defining the key terms...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".