MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135660166

Study of the Psychometric Properties of The Benson Complex Figure

2025· dissertation· cs· W7135660166 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminant validityCognitionConvergent validityReliability (semiconductor)PsychometricsContext (archaeology)RecallSet (abstract data type)Neuropsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This bachelor's thesis focuses on the psychometric properties of the Benson Complex Figure, which consists of three subtests - copy, recall, and recognition. The Benson Complex Figure is a diagnostic tool designed to assess visuospatial functions and visual memory, often used in the context of detecting cognitive impairment, and is included in the Uniform Data Set III test battery. The aim of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of the instrument in a selected sample of participants. Internal consistency of the individual subtests was evaluated. Discriminant validity was assessed based on the test's ability to differentiate between cognitively healthy individuals and patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment. Convergent validity was examined through correlations with the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and the Noise and Pareidolia Test. The findings indicate a satisfactory level of reliability and validity for the recall subtest, supporting its applicability in neuropsychological assessment. In contrast, the results of the copy and recognition subtests were significantly affected by a ceiling effect, which was notably present in both. The conclusion discusses the limitations of the study and proposes directions for further research and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it