MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135712303

The marketing strategy of a company Lululemon for implementation brand to czech market

2011· dissertation· cs· W7135712303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michaela Vorlová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechSWOT analysisMarketing strategyProfitability indexSituation analysisMarketing researchMarketing mixMarketing managementReturn on marketing investment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE MARKETING STRATEGY OF A COMPANY LULULEMON FOR IMPLEMENTATION BRAND TO CZECH MARKET Objectives: The thesis is focused on preparing the marketing strategy for Canadian company Lululemon which would like to expand to Czech market. This document will be used as an important support for the company while entering on a Czech market. Methods: Based on results of situational analysis is formed optimal marketing strategy for the company to expand on Czech market. In thesis I used methods of analysis of macro environment and micro environment, Porter five forces analysis and SWOT analysis, which identify internal and external environment of company. I also used method of personal questionnaire. Results: According to PEST analysis the situation in Czech Republic is stable and signal the safety and future profitability for Lululemon company. If company wants to compete with the known sports brands they have to invest more money to mass propagation and open new stores. Key words: marketing, marketing strategy, marketing mix, PEST analysis, SWOT analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207