Bibliographic record
Abstract
I Recent Issues of Regulation of International Carriage by Air Summary The purpose of my thesis is the analysis of regulation of international carriage by air where currently co-exist two regimes based on different international conventions. The Warsaw Convention was the first instrument that unified body of rules governing the international carriage by air, especially the most important areas: the arrangement of documents of carriage and the carrier's liability. Its most significant feature is the limited liability for sustained damages in case of death, wounding or any other bodily injury of passengers, in addition based on fault. It has been considered as deeply protective to air carriers. The only character in favor of passengers is the shifted burden of proof so that the airlines are presumed liable unless they can meet the necessary measures standards. Huge discontent with this regulation led to entering into arrangements that modified the Warsaw Convention. Non-uniformity of this regime has been the cause of adoption of new Montreal Convention which incorporates most of relevant norms contained in arrangements which modified the Warsaw Convention. Thus the Montreal convention contains some provisions of the Guatemala Protocol, the Guadalajara Convention and Montreal Protocols III and IV. The new...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".