Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 In my thesis titled Media, Imagery and Culture, I deal with the interconnection of these three separate fields of research. In the framework of visual studies, I search for visual research methods applicable in the cultural field. In the theoretical section, I discuss the conceptions of Canadian philosopher and media theorist Marshall McLuhan who determined three stages of communication development, one of which referenced an electronic culture. I go on to examine the philosophical Noosphere concept of a Catholic priest and scientist Teilhard de Chardin, corresponding with the McLuhan idea of electronic culture and the global village. I also analyze the concepts of art historians Ernst Hans Gombrich and Erwin Panofsky. In the field of visual studies, I follow the visual culture research of Marta Filipová and Matthew Rampley, and I examine communication expert Gillian Dyer's essay on pictures and advertisements. Lastly, I search for visual research methods applied in a variety of fields: anthropology, sociology and art history. The final part consists of four probes in which I apply visual research methods to the culture. In the first probe, I compare three different types of galleries: classic gallery (Czech Center in Prague), alternative exhibition hall (Tacheles) and virtual galleries. The probe was...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".