Compensation for damage arising from international air passenger transport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compensation for damage arising from international air passenger transport Abstract The diploma thesis focuses on a range of issues related to compensation for the damage arising out of international air transportation of passengers and their luggage. The thesis examines the topic in a complex way since the author first looks at the issue from a substantive point of view and then from the procedural application of the rights. Due to the cross-border nature of passenger air transport attention is paid to unified EU legislation which is directly applicable in its member states, in particular, Regulation No 261/2004 and Regulation No 2027/97 as amended by Regulation No 889/2002 as well as international regulation covered in the Montreal Convention. After the reader is introduced to the topic, the thesis portrays in detail situations in which the air carrier's liability for damage arises and which ordinarily affects the number of passengers. It is frequently relied on the conclusions of the Court of Justice of the European Union which helps to demonstrate the complicated functioning of legislation in practice. An essential part of the topic is passenger compensation. For this reason, the topic is concluded by means of enforcing passengers' rights while pointing out the main obstacles to the successful...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".