Bibliographic record
Abstract
Goal of this thesis was to study municipal, parish and school chronicles of the town of Přeštice, including their authors. The thesis is divided into four main chapters. In the first chapter, the history of the town of Přeštice is briefly outlined. The development of the town administration, parish and local schools is emphasized. The following chapter discusses the development of Czech chronicle writting. It also describes laws, standards and regulations that formed the management of chronicles and their content. The third chapter devotes to history of the chronicle writting of the town of Přeštice. It introduces each chronicle, all its authors and describes the form of its records. Subsequently, a comparison of the chronicles in time periods between the years 1831-1840 and 1867-1993 is done, including the analysis of their thematical intersections. In the conclusion, all of the findings are summarized and the directions of the future research are indicated. As a supplementary material, full text of all the laws, standards and regulations described in the second chapter, tables with an overview of all the described chronicles, photos of the chronicles and chroniclers are included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".