MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135791922

Nu begynder stjernekrigen

2017· article· da· W7135791922 on OpenAlexaff
Marlene Wind

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGovernment, Law, and Information Management
Canadian institutionsCentre for International Governance Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Wind powerThird generationWind speed
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professor og centerleder Marlene Wind var søndag den 18. juni interviewet i BT under overskriften ”Nu begynder stjernekrigen”. Brexit forhandlinger starter officielt i dag mandag den 19. juni, og professor Wind udtalte sig i relation til dette, om hvilke konsekvenser det nylige britiske valg har for Theresa Mays forhandlingsposition. Wind nævnte blandt andet, at det formelt ikke betyder noget, men at udfaldet af valget gør, at May står svagere og ikke har samme råderum. Dette skyldes, at hun nu skal cleare alle dele af forhandlingerne med DUP, hvilket kan gøre forhandlingerne meget langsommelige. En anden udfordrende del af forhandlingerne, som Wind understreger, er diskussionen om betaling af de 100 milliarder euro som Storbritannien skylder EU. Storbritannien vil ikke betale, og EU vil ikke gå videre med forhandlingerne, før dette punkt er afgjort. Wind nævner i tilknytning hertil, at EU står meget stejlt på denne holdning, hvilket yderligere kan bremse forhandlingerne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3220.203

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicGovernment, Law, and Information ManagementFrench-language works237,207